Published
“Burglary” and “trespass” are sometimes used casually to describe someone being somewhere they should not be. Florida law treats them as different offenses with different elements. A burglary allegation generally centers on entering or remaining in a dwelling, structure, or conveyance with a specified intent or under other circumstances listed in the statute. A trespass allegation under section 810.08 focuses on willfully entering or remaining without authorization, or refusing to leave after a warning.
The charging document and statute cited matter more than a shorthand label. This overview uses the current text of Florida Statutes section 810.02 and section 810.08. It cannot determine what happened or how either statute applies to a particular case.
Burglary can involve entering or remaining
For offenses committed after July 1, 2001, section 810.02 describes burglary in two broad ways. One is entering a dwelling, structure, or conveyance with intent to commit an offense inside, subject to statutory exceptions for places open to the public or entry by license or invitation. The other concerns remaining after an authorized or invited entry in specified circumstances, including remaining surreptitiously with intent to commit an offense, remaining after permission has been withdrawn with that intent, or remaining to commit or attempt a forcible felony.
That means “there was no broken lock” or “the person had been allowed inside earlier” does not by itself answer every legal question. The exact allegation, timing, permission, and evidence have to be considered under the statute. The intended offense is also not limited to theft.
Trespass focuses on authorization and notice
Section 810.08 addresses trespass in a structure or conveyance. In general terms, it covers willfully entering or remaining without authorization, license, or invitation, as well as refusing to leave after an authorized person gives a warning to depart. Florida has other trespass provisions for different settings, so the statute cited in the case should be checked rather than assuming one rule covers every property.
Burglary and trespass are not interchangeable labels. The charging theory, whether permission existed or was withdrawn, what the person allegedly intended, and what notice was given can all affect which offense the state alleges. A short incident report may leave out details that appear in messages, access records, witness accounts, or video.
Location and circumstances may affect the degree
Section 810.02 classifies burglary based on statutory circumstances that can include whether the place is a dwelling, structure, or conveyance; whether another person was present; whether an assault or battery occurred; whether the person was armed; and certain damage or vehicle-related conduct. This is not a complete list, and the statute has specific definitions and exceptions. A case should be evaluated using the subsection actually charged rather than a general description like “burglary.”
Preserve records that can show access and timing
Depending on the allegation, relevant material may include leases, permission messages, work orders, door or key-card logs, store or building video, photographs, receipts, and records showing when access was granted or revoked. Save originals and note where each item came from. Avoid editing recordings, deleting messages, or asking witnesses to change or coordinate what they remember.
- Which section and subsection appear in the charging document?
- Does the state allege entry, remaining, or both?
- What does the filing say about permission, notice, intent, and the location?
- Which facts are used to classify the alleged place or determine whether anyone was present?
- Are there court dates, release conditions, or preservation steps that need prompt attention?
Natalie Lopez, Esq. handles theft and property-crime matters. The firm’s theft-charge guide discusses other records that may be relevant when property allegations are involved.
Common questions
Does burglary require a broken door or forced entry?
Not necessarily. Section 810.02 also addresses remaining in a place in specified circumstances. The legal theory and evidence—not whether a lock was damaged—determine what issues need review.
Can a person be accused of burglary after being invited inside?
The statute includes limited situations involving remaining after an invited or authorized entry. Whether those provisions apply depends on the specific facts, the alleged intent or conduct, and the subsection charged.
Does an empty building rule out burglary?
No. The statute addresses different places and circumstances, including some situations where no other person is present. Occupancy may affect classification, but it is not the only fact that matters.
Is every trespass charge a misdemeanor?
Section 810.08 sets out a default classification and circumstances that can change it; other trespass statutes address other settings. The exact statute and subsection should be reviewed.
This article provides general legal information, not legal advice for an individual case. It does not predict an outcome or create an attorney-client relationship. Laws can change; consult a qualified attorney about a specific situation.
