Domestic Violence & Other Civil Suits
These are just some examples demonstrating our commitment to achieving personalized victorious outcomes for clients based on our vast knowledge of the real-life applications of Florida and Federal statutes and case law, along with significant in-court trial experience. Time is of the essence. Contact 954-888-8833 today to schedule a free confidential case evaluation.
—Our client was served with a temporary order of protection stating he was a danger, and demanding that his mental health be evaluated and he remove a website. This website mentioned damaging information about his neighbor’s past. This law firm successfully argued a motion to dismiss based on the client’s conduct being a constitutionally protected activity under the United States Constitution. Even though the website was the neighbors full name, we persuaded the court that the website was not directed at the neighbor. Even though the website listed personal opinions labeling the neighbor with offensive names, we convinced the court that the website served a legitimate purpose to warn the community of the neighbor’s past.
—Our client was served with a temporary order of protection alleging multiple allegations rape. This law firm successfully had the case dismissed after exposing the petitioner was lying and all interactions were consensual. The client avoided a permanent order of protection, criminal investigation, and criminal charges.
—Our client who was an inmate sentenced to life for murder was suing the correctional officers who work for the Florida Department of Corrections under the 42 United States Code 1983 civil rights statutes for beating him and causing injury. The attorneys for the prison originally would not budge from offering the client pennies to settle the case. The law firm got on the case, and investigated. This investigation included a full prison inspection, and gaining reports from well-known forensic experts who had testified for decades before the same assigned long standing conservative Federal Judge. This law firm succeeded with a rare settlement of $25,000.00.
—Our client had a permanent injunction wrongfully entered against him based on false statements. Over the course of 6 years, our client requested the court dismiss the case multiple times. The court always denied his request. The law firm got on the case, and despite the petitioner vehemently objecting to the dismissal, proved the permanent injunction no longer served a valid purpose. Case dismissed.
—Alongside many other defendants and years of gathered evidence, our client was being sued by the United States government agency Committee Future Trading Commission (CFTC) for 4 million dollars for unlawful affiliate marketing. We successfully negotiated a 1 million dollar settlement along with no admission to liability, thereby strongly avoiding criminal prosecution.
—Our client had a permanent injunction entered against him over two decades ago. He suffered for two decades being denied the ability to carry firearms, and for any promotions from his employer because he was denied access to gaining a state license to transport hazardous material. The firm got on the case, tracked down the original petitioner from two decades prior, and successfully argued based on various circumstances for a dismissal that the injunction no longer served a valid purpose. Before the July 2023 constitutional carry law, the firm had to aggressively assist with objecting to the Florida Department of Agriculture and Licensing regarding their original denials prohibiting the client from carrying a concealed firearm. The Department quickly agreed with the law firm and provided the client the ability to practice his Second Amendment rights.
—Our client was arrested for stalking the petitioner. These criminal allegations stemmed from the claim that the client placed GPS trackers on the petitioner’s property items and showed up unannounced to the petitioner’s place of work and home. On top of being arrested, the client was served with a temporary order of protection. After trial, the Court agreed with our argument that there was no other proof than the petitioner’s speculation that the client was the person who placed the GPS trackers on the petitioner’s property. Case dismissed.
—After our client disciplined their child, the other parent served a temporary order of protection to protect the child from the client. The client served in the military and was very nervous about this order becoming permanent. After preparing to conquer the case, the client testified about what happened that caused the child to be injured in various locations. The law firm uncovered evidence that the other parent previously disciplined the child. The court agreed with the law firm’s argument regarding the client’s honesty and motives. Case dismissed.
